<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Redrow Homes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4</link>
	<description>Kelly's New Home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compensation denied and a nasty letter by david merrick</title>
		<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/archives/2005/10/compensation-denied-and-a-nasty-letter.html/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>david merrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/2005/10/25/compensation-denied-and-a-nasty-letter/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>i brouht a sherborune in beverley east york i am currently have problems with drains because of poor workmanship in backfilling excavations the ground has sunk taking the drains with it.i am a oap so cannot afford the t he expence of having the damage rectified.i dont think the people in your advert would be very happy smiling if they were in my possition.D MERRICK HU178YP  20 MACE VIEW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i brouht a sherborune in beverley east york i am currently have problems with drains because of poor workmanship in backfilling excavations the ground has sunk taking the drains with it.i am a oap so cannot afford the t he expence of having the damage rectified.i dont think the people in your advert would be very happy smiling if they were in my possition.D MERRICK HU178YP  20 MACE VIEW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We have been in our Redrow &#8220;House From Hell&#8221; for 16 months by spence</title>
		<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/archives/2005/10/we-have-been-in-our-redrow-house-from-hell-for-16-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/2005/10/13/we-have-been-in-our-redrow-house-from-hell-for-16-months/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>omg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NHBC Report by kate</title>
		<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/archives/2005/10/nhbc-report.html/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/2005/10/17/nhbc-report/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>NHBC? An absolute joke. You will spend months phoning and writing and in the end they will take the builders side. Their &#039;inspectors&#039; don&#039;t even read the case notes before they arrive on site. It&#039;s a licence for shoddy work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NHBC? An absolute joke. You will spend months phoning and writing and in the end they will take the builders side. Their &#8216;inspectors&#8217; don&#8217;t even read the case notes before they arrive on site. It&#8217;s a licence for shoddy work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NHBC Report by Ray Chapman</title>
		<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/archives/2005/10/nhbc-report.html/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/2005/10/17/nhbc-report/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I am also at loggerheads with the NHBC who are just backsliders as far as I am concerned.  I have pursued these useless idiots for months and got nowhere.
Does any know, can anybody recommend a good solicitor who is prepared to take them on for me?  Any suggestions and I will be eternally grateful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also at loggerheads with the NHBC who are just backsliders as far as I am concerned.  I have pursued these useless idiots for months and got nowhere.<br />
Does any know, can anybody recommend a good solicitor who is prepared to take them on for me?  Any suggestions and I will be eternally grateful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NHBC Report by Fred</title>
		<link>http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/archives/2005/10/nhbc-report.html/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newhomeblogs.co.uk/weblog4/2005/10/17/nhbc-report/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hi, if you read the standards document carefully, you will notice in the introduction that the guidelines provide best practice etc etc. 

However, crucially, it also states that deviation from the guidelines is acceptable ***by prior consultation and evaluation***. You could try and argue that as no consultation / evaluation has been undertaken between the builder and the NHBC then the guidelines should be followed.

The NHBC will try and claim that the builders dont have to follow the guidelines. Personally I don&#039;t think this stands up and I feel that the NHBC don&#039;t understand their own standards documents properly.

If you can find anything in the building regulations, the NHBC technical requirements require that the build conforms to all building regs.... this would put you in a strong position.


Good luck anyone dealing with the NHBC, no a pleasant experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, if you read the standards document carefully, you will notice in the introduction that the guidelines provide best practice etc etc. </p>
<p>However, crucially, it also states that deviation from the guidelines is acceptable ***by prior consultation and evaluation***. You could try and argue that as no consultation / evaluation has been undertaken between the builder and the NHBC then the guidelines should be followed.</p>
<p>The NHBC will try and claim that the builders dont have to follow the guidelines. Personally I don&#8217;t think this stands up and I feel that the NHBC don&#8217;t understand their own standards documents properly.</p>
<p>If you can find anything in the building regulations, the NHBC technical requirements require that the build conforms to all building regs&#8230;. this would put you in a strong position.</p>
<p>Good luck anyone dealing with the NHBC, no a pleasant experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

